Skip to main content

Individualist or Group?



Connecting the ISPP article and "The Crowd" reading, we realize the consequences, both positive and negative, of individualism and being a part of a group. There are three very different and distinct aspects in being a political animal that are identified in the ISPP article. The first characteristic is that the human mind is shaped by social processes meaning that we are influenced by the aspects that characterize the social system. The second characteristic is that the human self is designed to expand and include other to form a group. This allows people to identify the ins and outs of a group, figuring out if the groups' beliefs are aligned with the individual or not. The last one is that people act to advance their group-based view of the world, comparing and contrasting groups. Individuals act in way that they learn and progress their interests as themselves and as subgroups. An example of this is labeling oneself as Liberal or Conservative.

Humans are political animals, we are engaged with social affairs. This is more of a deliberate action compared to how people act socially and culturally.

In "The Crowd" reading it also discusses individuals versus crowd. Humans are political animals, but as individuals humans are inferior to the crowd. A crowd could either be destructive and impulsive, but also could be heroic. It depends on the crowd's goals and intent. If a political animal is on its' own and has no support, its' claims and purposes will not be fulfilled to their desired extent.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Research Write Up

Rita Abdel-Malek Professor Andrews PSC 2410  29 November 2019 Research Paper  Introduction  The definition of nationalism and patriotism have been misused for the wrong purposes. Specifically in the 21st century the implications of each concept has been twisted and utilized solely to categorize and polarize people; radical nationalists and people who celebrate national holidays like ; Veterans Day, Independence Day, Memorial Day, etc. This research project was conducted to see how people viewed certain instances as either nationalistic or patriotic. In the modern century of Obama and Trump presidencies these concepts have been confused and majority people view on or the other as the same. This research is intended to delve into the psyche of everyday people, politically active or not. People have the innate need and want to feel like they belong and are mentally and physically safe. To achieve this, my group and I conducted a survey to analyze how people v...

Bullet Point Resume

Student Researcher Notre Dame de Namur University  Collaborated and facilitated a team research project  Researched in depth on the both nationalism and patriotism  Created a culmination of specific diverse questions for our survey  Surveyed multiple different demographics Allowed independent and collaborative team analysis  Presented hypothesis and analysis

Summary of Research

Nationalism is not a new concept. The manifestation of nationalism has been apparent all throughout the worlds history. The ways people act on this sense of identity and belonging can sway either way fairly easily. Patriotic acts are not publicized as much as ugly manifestations of nationalism are and that is because people like to see violence rather than peace. Due to this people cannot differentiate the two and identify the fine line between them. I have seen nationalism go very wrong in my home country. There is a clear difference between nationalism and patriotism and people would rather be violent and irrational than be proud and understanding of the other side. That is why I chose to research the topic because people need to know the difference before the assumptions get the best of them. I started with researching the different events in which either nationalism or patriotism have been demonstrated and how people can identify them easily. I then went in more depth with psycholo...